Showing posts with label phenomenal time wasters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phenomenal time wasters. Show all posts

Monday, October 26, 2009

My new favorite beverage


Goes nicely with our new favorite TV show (to which we are quickly becoming addicted -- thank the Lords of Kobol for our friends' DVD collection, so we don't have to wait 2 whole days for the next disc to arrive from Netflix!)

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Summer School

Even though it's summer vacation, my brain isn't getting it totally off. Today I faced a quandary. I was supposed to be cleaning off the table -- which is an excellent reason to get all sorts of other things done! It's amazing how productive you can be when you're supposed to be doing something else.

Ahem.

My quandary was this: I was trying to find x,

where W, H, and L are all known.

I had a dim memory of figuring out angles and sides and such of triangles back in the dark ages of High School Geometry. So with the resident Math Genius' help I learned that all I needed to do was find this angle:

To do that, first I had to isolate this triangle,

to find angle A.
In my particular quandary,
W=14
H=18
L=27

To get to the triangle, I had to chop them up.


Since the difference between 7 and 9 is 2 (or, as Miriam would say, "The difference? 9 is bigger than 7. Duhhh.") we now know that the length of the short side, or b, is 2. Since we know that the length of side a is 9 (because I said so), and this is a right triangle, we can use our magic wands to calculate the angle A. (I always liked working with sines and cosines...)

Okay, okay, so I know this is elementary to all you other Math Geniuses out there, but I want you all to be impressed that I slogged through all this even though it's been *cough*fifteenyears*cough* since I even LOOKED at a geometry book. (Some might argue that this is proof that mathiness is in the genes... "Destiny, destiny, no escaping destiny!")

As I was saying.

After browsing and hunting around and obviously procrastinating, I finally found the most awesome website for non-mathy-geniuses like me: an online side and angle calculator! God bless the Internet. So we enter our values into the magic boxes, and voila!


We have the magic angle number: 77.47. I will annoy all the precise mathy types and round down to plain 77. Because I'm like that.

So now we go back to our trapezoid and make another triangle and plug in the values.


Once again consulting our magic 8-ball website, abra cadabra, and we learn that the new b = 6.

Now we add everything up:


6 + 7 = 13
13 x 2 =26

x = 26! Doesn't that make you feel all warm and happy inside?


So now I'm sure you're all just DYING to know WHY I just HAD to find the length of one side of a trapezoid, when I should have been cleaning my dining table. (Which did eventually get clean, by the way.) The answer is that I wanted to make a wrap skirt that fit ME and not a preteen girl with no hips. Someone told me about an online pattern, so I used it to make myself a couple wrap skirts, but was grossly dissatisfied with their fit. It was way too tight in the hips and way too large in the waist -- i.e. ill-proportioned. The formula on the website was this:

Measure your waist, and add one half (since one panel will overlap in the front).
30 + 15 =45

Then multiply by .3 (since you want to divide that measurement approximately into thirds) to find the width of the top of one panel, or W above.
45 x .3 = 13.5 (round up to 14 -- there I go again!)

Now the online pattern then went on to suggest that one multiply by .4 to find the width of the bottom hem.
45 x .4 = 18

(You also add 3 inches to everything for seam allowances, but we're going to ignore that for now.)

Now if I followed that formula, it would make the panel look like this:

which, using all that magic again, would mean that H up above would equal about 15 (trust me on this one, unless you REALLY want to do the math yourself), which fits a 33-inch hip (going backwards: 15 / .3 x .66) -- which means that to fit that skirt pattern, one would have to be proportioned like a Barbie doll!!

I happen to be a REAL woman, thus the formula to find my hem width is closer to x .6 (I kind of wonder where the pattern designer came up with her infamous x .4? I tested it out on Miriam, and her magic formula for a good fit is x .5).

So the moral of the story, kids, is to make sure you're paying attention in high school math classes -- you never know when you're going to use it later!

Friday, February 13, 2009

Take that, UK atheists

You've heard of those atheist signs on buses, right? Well, here's Gregory Popcak's rejoinder:


You can play too at the bus slogan generator.

Here's mine.

Sunday, January 04, 2009

For Funzies

I've done this before, but seeing the result is still gratifying. :)

Who Would You Be in 1400 AD?...

The Prioress

You scored 16% Cardinal, 72% Monk, 56% Lady, and 30% Knight!


You are a moral person and are also highly intellectual. You like your solitude but are also kind and helpful to those around you. Guided by a belief in the goodness of mankind you will likely be canonized a saint after your life is over.


Take The Who Would You Be in 1400 AD Test
at HelloQuizzy

Monday, July 07, 2008

Honorary Member of the Geek Club?

There has been an ongoing discussion at F.U. News about whether one does or does not deserve to be included in the Geek club if one hasn't fulfilled a number of basic requirements. After Mom B. outed me, I left a lengthy comment about my qualifications. (I just thought of another one while posting this: I have a nodding acquaintance with html.)
I don't know if this counts, or if I get half credit (since I didn't fork over the $10 for the full version), or if it's just a sign of love of creativity and not geekiness, but I downloaded the Spore Creature Creator and designed two creatures. And had fun doing it!

Zornky

with Zornky Jr.

Puudlish (I had tried to make a Puudlie, and this was the closest I got until my imagination took over).

There now, aren't they cute? I know that by adding various attributes one can enhance the creatures' performance in the upcoming game. Since I don't plan to get the game, I don't give a rip, and can feel free to design creatures according to my little heart's content. Maybe I'll make one that's totally pimped out with as many features as I can fit on -- I've still got over 1500 Spore bucks to use up. :)